Title : Evaluating follow-up practices in the Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFCs) at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI): Optimising return treatments and appointments
Abstract:
Background: VFCs facilitate the management of fractures in efficient ways by potentially reducing unnecessary hospital visits and optimising patient care. However, there are inconsistencies in follow up protocols that can result in inefficiencies and longer waiting times.
Aim of Study: This audit aims to compare follow-up practices to standardised protocols at ARI’s VFC.
Materials and Methods: Data was compiled on 400 patients who attended the VFC between
September-December 2024. The variables include CHI, fracture type, treatment modality (e.g., cast, boot), follow-up instructions (e.g., return or discharge time) and communication methods.
Results: Several inconsistencies in follow-up practices and treatments were observed.
Conclusion/ Significance: Inconsistencies in the VFC can lead to unnecessary appointments which increase wait times overall and incorrect treatment type. Standardising follow-up times based on fracture types could improve care, reduce waiting times, and optimise clinic efficiency.
