Title : Biomechanical comparison of triangular osteosynthesis and triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization technique for pelvic fragility fractures
Abstract:
Introduction: Triangular Osteo Synthesis (TOS) is considered the gold-standard for treatment of Type IV Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP). as it provides vertical and horizontal stability through lumbopelvic fixation and iliosacral screws. An emerging Triangular Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Stabilization (TMSS) technique has been clinically introduced [Riesner et al 2021] as an alternative. This study aims to biomechanically compare the stability of TOS and TMSS in a cadaveric model of FFP Type IV U-shaped fractures.
Methods: Six fresh-frozen osteoporotic human cadaveric lumbopelvic spine specimens underwent simulated Type IV U-shaped sacral fractures and were instrumented with either TOS or TMSS constructs, the TOS (L4 Pedicle Screws – Iliac Screw), while the TMSS construct replaced the iliosacral screw with an inferior iliac screw and transverse rod for compression. They were subjected to cyclic loading (200 – 430 N for 25,000 cycles) simulating 3 to 4-week post-operative mobilization. Fracture displacement was measured using a 3D motion tracking system and the magnitude of the combined translation in the three cardinal planes (t-test (p<0.05)).
Results: The TMSS construct demonstrated after 25,000 cycles reduced maximum fracture displacement (6.05 mm) compared to TOS (12.12 mm), though statistical significance was not reached (p=0.071). Each, TOS and TMSS constructed exhibited 56% and 62% of the maximum facture displacement within the first 1,000 cycles.
Conclusions: The TMSS construct provides comparable biomechanical stability to TOS in stabilizing Type IV FFPs. Given its minimally invasive approach and promising biomechanical performance, TMSS represents a viable alternative for treating FFPs.

